IT Technology Services New Orleans

Final 5 IPv4 Address Blocks Handed Out Today.

By | news | No Comments

In a public ceremony in Miami, the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority handed out the last five remaining IPv4 address blocks to the regional organizations. The IPv6 transition has begun.


The gradual transition to Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6) has official begun with the distribution of the last five remaining IPv4 address blocks to each regional organization overseeing the net address assignments.

The official distribution took place in a ceremony to mark the occasion in Miami on Feb. 3. AfriNIC, the regional Internet registry that oversees IP address allocation in Africa, received the first of the remaining IPv4 blocks, followed by Asia Pacific Network Information Center (APNIC), American Registry of Internet Numbers (ARIN), for North America, and Latin American and Caribbean Internet Addresses Registry (LACNIC). The RIR for Europe and Middle East, RIPE NCC, received the final block 185/8, marking the end of available addresses under the current IPv4 system.

“A pool of more than 4 billion Internet addresses has just been emptied this morning; completely depleted,” said Rod Beckstrom, president and CEO of ICANN (Internet corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) on a panel at a press conference following the ceremony. “There are no more,” he said. Raul Echeberria, chair of the Number Resource Orgnaization (NRO), Lynn St. Amour, president and CEO of the Internet Society, and Olaf Kolkman, chair of Internet Architecture Board joined Beckstrom on the panel.

APNIC requested and received two blocks of addresses from the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) on Feb. 1. The assignment triggered an ICANN rule which stated that when only five blocks of addresses remain in the centralized pool, they will be automatically assigned to each RIR.

Each regional authority have their own policies and rules for how these addresses will be allocated, and each region will run out at different times, according to St. Amour. North America’s fresh supply of IPv4 addresses will probably last only three to nine months, said John Curran, president and CEO of ARIN. Faced with explosive economic growth in the Asia-Pacific region, APNIC is also expected to run through the blocks it received earlier this week fairly quickly, prompting the organization to implement new rules.

APNIC will restrict address assignments to the “smallest allocations” to ensure the final block lasts five to ten years, said Paul Wilson, APNIC’s Director General. “The transition to IPv6 should be well underway by then,” he said at the press conference.

IPv4 address exhaustion was “both significant and insignificant,” said Kolkman. Significant because even though it was long anticipated, it marked the end of the existing system, but insignificant because “next week, the Internet won’t be significantly different from today,” he said. He likened the situation to running out of license plates. “We will still drive,” he said.

Vint Cerf, Google’s current chief Internet evangelist and “father of the Internet” selected the 32-bit system in 1977 because he thought a pool of 4.3 billion possible IP addresses would be “enough to do an experiment,” according to Beckstrom. Not only has the experiment not ended, there are more possibilities, including refrigerators that send out alerts when out of milk and cars that are wireless hotspots on wheels, Beckstrom said.

With the depletion of IPv4 addresses, the next batch of addresses that will be available from IANA will be IPv6 addresses, which utilizes the 128-bit system and has over 340 undecillion possible addresses. The transition was a “generational” change, said St. Amour. “The previous generation won’t go away, and it will still have a lot to contribute, but the future is IPv6,” she said.

Citing no “imminent danger” to the Internet, Kolkman said devices with IPv4 will be around for at least “a decade, two decades” but that IPv6 will account for a majority of the systems within a decade. It will take time for the legacy systems to migrate, he said.

The rate of IPv6 adoption hasn’t been as fast because “there have still been IPv4 addresses,” Echeberria joked. However, IPv6 requires investment and effort, he said.

“Ordinary users shouldn’t notice the transition to IPv6,” as it will be the responsibility of the network operators, Kolkman said. Most devices are already IPv6-capable, he said.

While there are approximately two billion people online, there are “not enough addresses” in the IPv4 system to bring the remainder of the six billion online, Kolkman said. The next two to three billion people who will be coming online will run IPv6 only and businesses and services who don’t make the transition to the new address system “won’t be able to do business” with them, he said.

Internet stakeholders, such as governments with e-services, need to invest in IPv6 or face the prospect of not reaching their citizenry, said Echeberria.

There is no extra cost for organizations to switch to IPv6 since organization have known about it and “we’ve been doing deployments already,” said ARIN’s John Curran. Turning on IPv6 doesn’t cost more, since it’s “usually just a configuration change” and it’s part of the normal business costs of new deployments, he said. Organizations have to switch to thinking about IPv6 and including it in the normal course of planning new projects, he said.

“The question is not what’s the cost of doing IPv6, but what’s the cost of not doing IPv6,” said Adiel Akplogan, AfriNIC’s CEO.

Lawsuit: iPhone users systematically overcharged by ATT

By | iPhone, Uncategorized | No Comments

Ever get the feeling that the itemized charges on your cell phone bill aren’t quite right? A new class-action lawsuit filed against AT&T claims that often, they aren’t — and the mistakes could be costing consumers millions.

AT&T’s iPhone data service is like a gas station that “charges for a full gallon when it only pumps nine-tenth of a gallon into your tank,” according to a lawsuit filed late last week. The company overstates data downloads by 7 percent to 14 percent, which could lead to overage charges for consumers who aren’t signed up for the iPhone’s all-you-can-eat data plan, it said.

The suit, filed Thursday in federal court in the Northern District of California, also claims that AT&T sometimes charges consumers for entirely phantom downloads, ringing up charges even when the phone’s Internet connection is off. The lawsuit compares this to a “rigged gas pump charging you when you never even pulled your car into the station.”

And it claims that the firm’s billing software is so out of whack that it incorrectly logs the date and time of data connections, causing some to appear on the wrong month’s billing cycle, which also could lead to overcharging.

AT&T said that accurate billing is a priority for the firm, and it intends to vigorously defend itself against the lawsuit.

“In fact, we’ve created tools that let our customers check their voice and data usage at any time during their billing cycle to help eliminate bill surprises,” the firm told Macnn.com

The lawsuit seeks both federal and California class-action status.

Plaintiff Patrick Hendricks, who lives in Alameda County, Calif., subscribes to AT&T’s limited data plan for the iPhone, which grants him 200 megabytes of downloads for $15 per month. He routinely exceeded his allotment, the lawsuit says, leading to excessive fees. Later, he curtailed his usage of the iPhone to avoid fees, unfairly limiting his use of the service.

The lawsuit claims AT&T has broken both federal and state consumers laws, and accuses the firm of committing “unlawful, unfair and fraudulent business practices,” through a “rigged billing system.”

As proof of unfair practices, attorneys for the plaintiff say they hired an independent consulting firm to run tests on iPhone data downloads. In one case, the firm found a 50KB website was logged as a 53.5KB website. In another case, a consultant purchased a brand-new phone, turned off all services and still was billed for 35 data transactions totaling 2,292 KB of usage, the lawsuit alleges.

While the overages might only cost customers a few dollars each month, the lawsuit alleges AT&T has enjoyed a big boost to its bottom line through overcharging.

“In the fourth quarter of 2010, AT&T reported its wireless revenues increased $1.1 billion … from the year earlier quarter,” the lawsuit said.”A significant portion of those data revenues were inflated by AT&T’s rigged billing system for data transactions.”

iPhone users — in fact, virtually all limited data-plan users — have little trouble finding allegations of billing improprieties online from other consumers. But because itemized cell phone bills are so mysterious — some firms even charge extra for them — and because special software is required to log downloads precisely, there is virtually no way an average consumer would discover small data overage charges.

Systematic telephone service billing errors have a long and storied history. During the 1980s, errors on long-distance bills were so common that an entire industry developed around auditing corporate phone bills for major errors and gaining refunds. So-called “metering” mistakes remain common. Just last April, AT&T was forced to appear before the Tennessee Regulatory Authority to explain a computer error that led to overcharges levied against 15,000 state residents. One resident who was paying $25 for unlimited long-distance calling received a surprise $921 bill.

AT&T’s wireless business, now called AT&T Mobility, has been the target of class-action lawsuits related to billing before.

Last year, it settled charges that it intentionally degraded service after acquiring rival Cingular, forcing consumers to either pay $175 early termination fees or early upgrade charges. The firm admitted no wrongdoing but agreed to pay millions in refunds to consumers who paid early termination fees during a 12-year span.

And in November, AT&T settled a lawsuit alleging the firm overbilled iPhone users for taxes. Again, the firm admitted no wrongdoing but pledged to refund consumers.

Attorneys for Patrick Hendricks have asked that consumers receive refunds, and also that AT&T be hit with punitive charges for committing unfair business practices.